• Home
  • About
  • Recipe Index

Cookie Madness

menu icon
go to homepage
  • Home
  • About
  • Recipe Index
subscribe
search icon
Homepage link
  • Home
  • About
  • Recipe Index
×
Home » Chocolate Cakes

Hot Chocolate Fudge Cakes

Modified: Feb 1, 2021 · Published: Dec 3, 2008 by Anna · This post may contain affiliate links · 25 Comments

Today’s dessert is Hot Chocolate Fudge Cakes from the most recent issue of Cooking Light. What’s special about this recipes is that it's a lightened up version of a classic make-ahead dessert.  And this time of year that’s a real plus, because hosts have enough other aspects of the meal to worry about. Hot Chocolate Fudge Cake, if well executed, never disappoints. It’s served hot so guests fall under the illusion that you went to a lot of trouble when really, all you did was slip away from the dinner table for 2 minutes to slip a tray of these into the oven and start the coffee.

Hot Chocolate Fudge Cake from Cooking Light

And do these taste light? Well, they were ranked very high by the editors of CL and I can tell you that the ones I made tasted as good as you’d get in a restaurant. The secret is to measure your flour properly not to skimp on the good cocoa and chocolate. Use the best you can afford – and you’ll be able to afford the good stuff because the recipe only calls for a small amount. A little goes a long way.

Speaking of little. If you don’t have 4 oz ramekins, you can find them at most kitchen stores. I bought mine at a store here in Austin called Faraday’s. The 4 oz ramekins look tiny, but when you fill them with batter and actually bake up the little cakes, you’ll be satisfied with their size.

And one last thing, I didn’t bother with the 1 cup of egg substitute. It only cuts 20 calories off each dessert and eggs are cheaper and more convenient. I used 4 large eggs and would do it again that way. If you’re worried about egg safety, you could buy pasteurized eggs.

So all in all I’d say these were seriously good and I’ll be making them again soon.

Click For Recipe

More Chocolate Cakes on Cookie Madness

  • A slice of Brooklyn Blackout Cake to illustrate the recipe.
    Brooklyn Blackout Cake
  • Gigi's Triple Chocolate Truffle Cake
    Gigi's Triple Chocolate Truffle Cake
  • Coconut Ring Cake from The Pillsbury Bake-off 1971
    Ring of Coconut Cake
  • Oreo Pudding Poke Cake
    Oreo Pudding Poke Cake

Comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *






  1. Scott Bishop says

    November 20, 2009 at 6:37 am

    Now that looks VERY nice indeed! You gotta love anything that chocolate oozes out of!

  2. Anna says

    June 29, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    The note is for people concerned about eating things with undercooked eggs. If you're not concerned, don't worry about it. I'm pretty sure the center gets hot enough (160 degrees F) to kill the salmonella, but I've never stuck a thermometer in the center to test. You can't be too careful when it comes to salmonella.

  3. Queenscook says

    June 29, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    I don't understand why you say "If you’re worried about egg safety, you could buy pasteurized eggs." The recipe is bakes at 350 for over 20 minutes, so there are no raw eggs to worry about. Am I missing something?

  4. Anna says

    June 03, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    Carol, I think they'd be fine without it.

  5. Carol says

    June 03, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    I want to make these for a dinner party but do not like coffee and some of the guests don't drink it. Can I leave out the espresso powder and still have a good result ? Thanks.

  6. Anna says

    December 25, 2008 at 8:27 pm

    Hi Lorrie,

    It sounds to me like either you accidentlly used too much flour (easy to do if you don't have a scale!) or over-cooked them. Has your oven been running a little hot?

    But back to the flour, unless you weigh it or *very* carefully spoon and level without shaking the cup, it's easy to use too much. Wish I was there to troubleshoot with you. It's probably one little thing that's messing everything up.

  7. Lorrie says

    December 25, 2008 at 7:38 pm

    I tried these today and my centers did not come out molten - just cake-like. Delicious, but not at all gooey in the center. I followed the recipe to the letter. What could have gone wrong?

  8. Anna says

    December 06, 2008 at 11:45 pm

    Onew of these days I'll try the chocolate decadence.

  9. pumpkinpie says

    December 06, 2008 at 11:02 pm

    I also made this recipe using real eggs. My husband and I thought they were fantastic-- crusty top, gooey middle, and rich chocolate taste. We did not bake the entire recipe at once; just kept the batter in the refrigerator and baked on a need-to-eat basis. The Cooking Light Chocolate Decadence is also really delicious but the serving size is smaller, calories are higher, and the preparation is fussier.

  10. Pearl says

    December 05, 2008 at 12:27 am

    that looks great! i'll pick up some ramekins... they are always so adorable

  11. Karen says

    December 04, 2008 at 4:41 pm

    Anna,
    Have you made the Chocolate Decadence from Cooking Light? How do these compared. My family loves those but I would like to try this new recipe.

  12. Cocoazilla says

    December 04, 2008 at 11:07 am

    I love Cooking Light. I saw this on the cover and fell in love, it's great to see someone else be able to make it just like the cover! (Gives me hope!)

  13. Dani says

    December 04, 2008 at 6:45 am

    my "to bake" list gets longer every time i visit you LOL

  14. Dorothy says

    December 03, 2008 at 8:59 pm

    hahaha i just bought that issue because i loved the picture of the hot fudge cakes on the cover! i'm glad you tried them because i was afraid they would turn out tasting "light"

  15. Another Valerie says

    December 03, 2008 at 8:18 pm

    I really wanted to make these when I got my issue but there's only 2 of us and I don't feel like they'd reheat very good and for some reason (I can't remember now) I thought they would be hard to cut in half or smaller. I'll just have to have a few friends over!

  16. Joanna says

    December 03, 2008 at 4:14 pm

    these remind me of molten lava cakes. they look amazing!!! are they nice and chocolately in the center? i sure hope so.

  17. Heather - Ghost Baker says

    December 03, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    Mmm.. thanks for this review! On impulse I picked up the latest Cooking Light at the grocery store on Monday (yes, seeing the lovely hot chocolate fudge cakes on the cover). I'm glad to know that they're good! I will have to try them at my next dinner party and, as you suggested, slip away to pop them in the oven!

  18. AJ says

    December 03, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    I printed it to try, but I'm curious how the granulated sugar works out. My favorite "molten lava cake" recipe uses powdered sugar instead... and I was out once and tried granulated sugar, it just wasn't the same (texture wise).

    Here's my fav: http://www.mccormickgourmet.com/gcrecipeprint.cfm?id=11322

    I omit the cloves and just do a pinch of cinnamon and ginger. I also use mexican vanilla and add 1.5 tsp.

  19. Anna says

    December 03, 2008 at 2:39 pm

    Yes, there was enough batter for 10. Maybe the reviewer filed hers a bit too high?

  20. Jenn's Baking Chamber says

    December 03, 2008 at 2:32 pm

    These remind me of the lava cakes that Cactus Club serves! yummmmy!

  21. Sara says

    December 03, 2008 at 1:47 pm

    The reviews on the website said that the recipe really only made enough for 7 ramekins, which makes them a lot less light...did you get enough for the full 10 ramekins?

  22. Jennifer says

    December 03, 2008 at 1:42 pm

    Wow, that does look great! I love another cooking light ramekin requiring recipe, for chocolate souffle's, so good!

  23. Kim says

    December 03, 2008 at 1:41 pm

    This chocolate dessert looks absolutely heavenly! Great job!

  24. VeggieGirl says

    December 03, 2008 at 1:14 pm

    Wowza! Those look heavenly.

  25. Madison says

    December 03, 2008 at 12:40 pm

    wow, that is making me want chocolate!! looks sooo delicious!

Peanut Butter Fudge Jumbles recipe baked in a 9-inch square Pampered Chef stoneware pan.

Hello!

I'm Anna, and welcome to Cookie Madness. To learn more about me, check the About page.

About

Footer

About

Privacy

Contact

    Cookie Madness is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.

    © All rights reserved. Do not copy, distribute, or reproduce without permission.